Cantrell traffic enforcement plan could cause problems for public defenders
19th November 2018 · 0 Comments
By Michael Isaac Stein
The Lens
Many New Orleans drivers rejoiced two weeks ago when Mayor LaToya Cantrell’s administration announced that it would take down a small portion of the city’s traffic cameras. But that jubilation may have been premature.
At his New Orleans City Council budget hearing on Tuesday, New Orleans Police Superintendent Michael Harrison informed the City Council about plans to ramp up traffic stops by NOPD officers as part of a new “enhanced traffic enforcement program.”
The Chief District Defender at the Orleans Public Defenders office, Derwyn Bunton, said that this program — which he thinks is likely to lead to increased arrests, therefore increasing the office’s workload — will make it difficult for his office to keep up.
“Our ability to defend the constitution, protect the innocent, and do our job inside the criminal justice system is actually getting harder with this traffic enhancement program,” he told The Lens.
Bunton’s office receives a portion of every traffic camera fine, along with portions of court fines and fees. According to his presentation at last Wednesday’s budget hearing, fines and fees accounted for $2.7 million in revenues this year, or 36 percent of the Orleans Public Defenders’ year-to-date budget. Of that, traffic camera fines brought in $1.3 million.
But Bunton has long criticized this so-called “user pay” system for funding public defenders. He’s lobbying for more direct appropriations from the city’s general fund in order to help make up potentially lost traffic camera revenue, which he estimates at $300,000.
While Cantrell’s budget calls for increases for police and prosecutors, it holds direct city funding for the defenders office steady at about $1.5 million.
At his office’s budget hearing on last Wednesday, Bunton told the City Council that under the current budget, his office will be forced to implement a hiring freeze and stop accepting some cases when the new year begins.
Traffic Safety Or Revenue Generator?
While the enhanced traffic enforcement program will expand the number of officers patrolling for traffic violations, it will also increase the fines they dole out.
For 11 different traffic violations, including improper turns and tailgating, NOPD officers have the option to issue either a municipal violation or a state-law violation. State violations carry a steeper fine. In some cases, the state fine is nearly double the size of the municipal one.
Currently, NOPD officers opt for the smaller, municipal fine in 75 percent of the issued tickets in those 11 categories, according to numbers provided by the Cantrell administration. But now, officers will be encouraged to hand out the higher state fines, Cantrell’s Chief Administrative Officer Gilbert Montano told the City Council on last Tuesday.
Montano said that based on last year’s citation data, a switch to state fines would increase city collections by $1.2 million. If officers give out more tickets than in 2018, that number would grow even higher.
During her mayoral campaign, Cantrell repeatedly promised to take down all traffic cameras if elected mayor, or at least suspend the program pending a comprehensive review. With her proposed budget, she is partially following through by removing 20 of 31 non-school zone traffic cameras and turning off school-zone cameras outside of school hours.
Last week, Montano told the Council that removing those traffic cameras will lose the city $4 to $6 million in revenue. But at least one council member is worried that the city is simply making up for the removals with other enforcement tactics.
“Traffic cameras are coming down, and all of a sudden NOPD traffic stops are going up and these traffic fines are going up,” Councilwoman Helena Moreno said in an interview. “Combined, this says to me that the NOPD is becoming a money generator. And that worries me.”
Harrison said that the primary goal of the program is to increase road safety and reduce fatalities, not make up for lost funds. But Moreno was skeptical.
“I’ve never heard [traffic safety] brought up,” she said. “I’ve never heard it brought up in the budget meetings. I’ve never heard it brought up in community meetings.”
When Councilman Jason Williams asked how many driving fatalities had occurred in New Orleans this year, Harrison could not say. A Louisiana State University traffic crash database showed 30 traffic fatalities in the city for this year as of this week.
“I would hope that the number of traffic fatalities would be somehow part of the conversation to shift officers away from shootings, armed robberies, and sexual assaults,” Williams said.
Montano said that the switch to higher state fines was intended to increase consistency in NOPD police reports.
User-Pay System
“This is part of what’s wrong with our criminal justice system. It is a user-pay system,” Bunton told The Lens. “It’s always going to produce inadequate, unreliable, and unstable funding for us.”
Bunton said he’s concerned with the arrests that he believes will inevitably result from the program.
“This program is going to be very difficult on our office,” he said. “If it performs the way they want, it will mean an increase in traffic stops and probably an increase in arrests.”
Part of that increase will come from illicit activity, such as drug possession, discovered during the stops. More arrests are also likely because many New Orleans residents have outstanding warrants or attachments that they don’t know about, according to Bunton. He said his office has been working to create venues that allow people to clear their records without the risk of arrest.
“In a traffic stop situation, all the police officer has in front of them is a warrant and the person with that outstanding warrant,” he said. “Many times that results in an arrest. That endangers a lot of the progress we’ve made in reducing our jail population. But it also reduces the progress we’ve made in gathering credibility with the community.”
Moreno also raised concerns over how this program could damage some of the trust the NOPD has built in an attempt to move towards “community policing.” She questioned whether there weren’t better uses of officers’ time, given the city’s high violent crime rate and understaffed police department.
“I’m hoping the CAO will reconsider this,” she told The Lens.
Another problem, according to Bunton, is that the program could exasperate existing racial biases in the criminal justice system. The problem has been a focus of the six-year-old NOPD consent decree — aimed at eliminating police civil rights abuses — which has placed the department under the supervision of a federal judge and a team of monitors.
“There’s always a risk of disparate enforcement when it comes to traffic stops,” Bunton said. “And I think studies around the country have shown that no matter how well meaning, many of these programs end up being ethnically and racially biased.”
In a 2017 review of the NOPD, the consent decree monitors audited NOPD stops, searches, and arrests and found possible consent decree violations in 20 percent of police body camera videos they viewed.
“This remains an area of concern,” the report says.
A 2017 survey community survey conducted by the monitoring team found that 68.5 percent of residents either agreed or strongly agreed that NOPD officers harass people during stops.
Harrison said the department would increase traffic stops by diverting overtime hours that would have otherwise been used to review traffic camera footage. In the long-term, he said that the increase in personnel, made possible by greater funding in Cantrell’s budget, will free up officers to take on regular traffic enforcement duty.
Chief Defender Says Budget Reverses Equity Gains
The NOPD is slated to receive a nearly $12 million increase — to a total budget of $190 million — under Cantrell’s budget proposal. And Orleans Parish District Attorney Leon Cannizzaro’s office will see a $600,000 increase. That increase restores funds cut from prosecutors’ budget over the past two years, a major point of contention between Cannizzaro and City Hall.
The DA’s total annual budget — including state funds and other sources — ranges from about $14 million to $15 million annually, nearly double the public defenders’ total annual budget.
These raises are in line with Mayor Cantrell’s primary budget priority: public safety initiatives. Aside from increases to the police and city prosecutor’s office, Cantrell’s administration also plans to aggressively expand the city’s surveillance system and has budgeted $3.5 million to cover the salaries of the 18 employees who monitor surveillance footage at the city’s real time crime monitoring center.
“These programs are going to be very difficult on our office,” Bunton said. “With the resources being allocated to us in the current budget, there’s no way we’d be able to keep up. In fact, we are planning for more services restrictions. We are not planning to take on more cases.”
The public defenders’ office, unlike these other criminal justice offices, is not receiving any general fund revenue increase under the mayor’s budget proposal. Overall, the office is bracing for a budget decrease due to lower state funding and the removal of some city traffic cameras. The public defenders’ office receives $5 for every traffic camera fine.
“This is simply unreliable and unsustainable,” read a press release from the public defenders office. “Despite representing nearly 85 percent of all defendants in Orleans Parish.”
The press release noted that the DA’s general appropriation from the city for next year — $6.7 million — is slated to be almost five times the size of the Orleans Public Defenders’ — about $1.5 million.
Bunton said Cantrell’s budget represents a reversal of slow but positive change towards a more balanced criminal justice system.
“For the last eight years the equity has been getting better in terms of our resources relative to other agencies within the criminal justice system,” Bunton said. “This budget coupled with other proposals takes us back.”
Bunton said that his office is now facing a hiring freeze as well as possible furloughs and layoffs.
“With the forecast right now, it’s that serious for us,” he said.
Another major issue the public defenders’ office is grappling with is its ability to offer conflict representation. Conflicts in representation occur when multiple indigent defendants are facing charges stemming from the same alleged incident.
It would be unethical, for example, for an attorney to urge their client to testify against an associate to get a better deal from prosecutors if the attorney represented that associate as well. For cases like this, the public defenders’ office must sometimes hire outside counsel to represent defendants.
In 2016, The Advocate reported that these “conflict cases” made up 25 percent of the public defenders’ felony cases. And Bunton said these conflicts have only increased as the NOPD turns their focus to group crimes.
Group prosecution grew under former Mayor Mitch Landrieu beginning with the establishment of the multi-agency gang unit in 2012. More recently, in August, the NOPD, along with state and federal agencies, executed a drug sting called “Operation Summer Heat,” during which investigators arrested 71 people in five days.
“They engaged this year in Operation Summer Heat, which spiked our conflict budget,” Bunton said. “That’s why we’re pretty much out of money for conflict representation, because of things like Summer Heat.”
If the public defender’s office can’t afford new conflict cases, defendants will have to sit in jail for extended periods of time, raising the cost to the city for pretrial detention. If they’re held too long without an appointed lawyer, they will be released, Bunton said.
Bunton gave these same warnings when his office faced a similar budget decrease in 2015 and 2016. His office initiated a hiring freeze and stopped accepting some new felony cases as a result, leaving dozens of defendants in limbo.
“We must establish an alternative to our user-pay system,” Bunton said, “or we will continue to jump from crisis to crisis.”
The above article originally appeared in The Lens on its website (www.thelensnola.org). The Louisiana Weekly enjoys a partnership with The Lens.
This article originally published in the November 19, 2018 print edition of The Louisiana Weekly newspaper.
