Filed Under:  National

Citizenship question fuels confrontations over 2020 Census

16th April 2018   ·   0 Comments

By Khalil Abdullah
Contributing Writer

(Special to Trice Edney News Wire from Ethnic Media Services) — “We will not allow our community to cower in fear,” exclaimed Arturo Vargas, executive director of the NALEO Education Fund, voicing his fervent opposition to Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross’s stated intention to include a question asking respondents to the 2020 Census if they are American citizens.

In a conversation with Ross on March 13, Vargas said he shared “what he knew” from speaking with Latino community leaders who reported their constituents being wary of participating in the census even before the addition of the citizenship question was proposed.

Additionally, Vargas noted that the gamut of opposition to including the question spans past Census Bureau directors, its scientific advisors, and former Commerce Secretaries from Democratic and Republican administrations.

Ross “did not listen,” Vargas charged, resulting in the “worst policy decision” that could have been made regarding an accurate census count. “I conclude this is a tactic to scare people away from the census,” Vargas said.

Vargas’s stance, echoed by other panelists on a media telebriefing, organized by the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and Ethnic Media Services, is that the administration’s initiatives to aggressively deter immigration will not only yield a lower census response rate, but that the inevitable result will be the reduction in the allocation of federal dollars to the very communities most in need.

As the panelists emphasized, the constitutionally mandated census objective is to accurately count the number of people residing in America, not the number of its citizens.

Vanita Gupta, president and CEO of the Leadership Conference, explained that “data collected through the Census determines how House [of Representatives] seats are set and informs decisions about the allocation of funding to support state and local community resources like schools, hospitals, education, and transportation.”

Gupta also took aim at other factors, she argued, which could negatively impact the census, including what current underfunding of the 2020 Census itself and delays in implementing census partnership and communications outreach programs tailored to reach communities with historically undercounted persons.

Latinos are more apt to be undercounted in a rate three times that of Anglo Americans and, as Vargas explained, of the one million children uncounted in the 2010 census, 400,000 were Latino. Asian Americans, Native Americans, and low-income communities generally suffer from less than fully funded federal monetary allocations to their communities due to inaccurate data.

Typically, counting Americans in sometimes remote rural areas often brings unique challenges to data collection efforts as well. And, as panelist Marc Morial observed, African Americans also, despite their centuries of citizenship status, historically have been disenfranchised politically and economically by census undercounts. African Americans are more likely to be undercounted than Anglo Americans who were overcounted in 2000 and 2010.

Morial, president and CEO of the National Urban League, is calling on African Americans to up their participation in the 2020 Census and urging them to “not forget their children” — who were undercounted by 6.5 percent in the 2010 census — when complying with data collection efforts.

Morial especially decries what he termed “prison-based gerrymandering” where prisoners are counted as residents of the jails and prisons where they are incarcerated rather than in the homes where they reside otherwise.

For example, if Louisiana were a country, it would rank number two as the world’s leader in the rate of incarcerating its own residents, only recently edged out of the number one spot by the District of Columbia, the nation’s capital. A former Louisiana state legislator and a past mayor of New Orleans, Morial said he is keenly aware of how some of Louisiana’s predominantly Anglo parishes reap the benefit of tax dollars derived from their African-American prisoners. “These are dollars that should be flowing back to towns and communities where African Americans live,” Morial said.

In addition, an investigative report by The Times-Picayune shows how, through monetary profit-sharing arrangements for local sheriffs, the private prison industry has incentivized longer sentences and higher rates of incarceration in Louisiana.

Morial, a past chair of a presidentially appointed advisory committee on the census, said the issue of prison-based gerrymandering had received more comments than on any other census question issue during his tenure. He had high expectations that the Census Bureau would have considered steps to end that practice, especially if the decision had been left to the Census Bureau’s professional staff. He said his hopes have been dashed under the Trump administration. “The census has been politicized,” Morial contended.

“The census undercount began with African Americans being relegated to being considered only three-fifths on man in the first census,” Morial said, “and now the practice of prison-based gerrymandering has become one that is largely an African-American issue, regardless of political affiliation. We have to begin to look at some other remedies to force the issue.”

Morial did not specify whether litigation would be an option to address prison-based gerrymandering, but he wholly supported the panelists who said they are intent on pursuing litigation against Ross and the Census Bureau on the citizenship question. Those actions would augment lawsuits already initiated by Maryland, Virginia, and the District of Columbia, among others, including the U.S. Conference of Mayors which includes prominent Republican members.

At the heart of the disputed census citizenship question is the issue of trust between the U.S. government and America’s residents. One reporter asked whether census data could again be used to assist U.S. government agencies in detaining immigrants as occurred with Japanese Americans at the onset of World War II.

John Yang, president and executive director, Asian Americans Advancing Justice, said, “The confidentiality and privacy provisions have been strengthened greatly since that time in direct response to what happened — that travesty that happened during World War II.”

Yang explained that the Census Bureau is prohibited from sharing census data. This includes with the IRS, Homeland Security or the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. He said American residents have an obligation to assure the best census, an outcome would accrue to the benefit of all, including to Asian Americans who have the highest growth rate of ethnic communities in the United States.

But from Arturo Vargas’s perspective, the damage to the trust between the U.S. government and its peoples has already been done by even raising the citizenship question – even if the parties litigating against Commerce Secretary Ross and the Census Bureau are successful.

“I see it every day,” Vargas, said, “that people are afraid of their government.”

This article originally published in the April 16, 2018 print edition of The Louisiana Weekly newspaper.

Readers Comments (0)


You must be logged in to post a comment.