ISIS may be less cutthroat than you are

29th September 2014   ·   0 Comments

By Fr. Jerome LeDoux
Contributing Columnist

“How dare quick easy loans now you say, ‘ISIS may be less cutthroat than you are!’ I don’t go around beheading people, crucifying them, shooting them or burying them alive!”

Thank God, you don’t. However, if you are one of the 47% of Americans who are pro-choice, you had better examine your conscience and have a pow wow with God, for “You are thinking not as God does, but as human beings do.” (Matthew 16:23)

And if you are one of the 8% of Americans – including the U.S. President and First Lady – who believe in partial-birth abortion, you have moral problems coming out of your ears. The blunt truth is that, after the 20th week of pregnancy, the procedure banned under the Act (see below), known in medical circles as dilation and extraction (D&X) or intact dilation and evacuation, involves dilating the cervix, extracting from the uterus all but the head of the fetus, puncturing the skull and removing the brain tissue through suction.

After striking down a Nebraska statute that banned partial-birth abortion in payday loans in griffin ga 2000, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed itself in 2007, ruling that the Federal Partial Abortion Act does not violate the constitutional right to abortion. That means, in the practice of ordinary abortions now so commonplace that most people are numbed to it, partial-birth abortion is deemed too barbaric and too inhumane to be tolerated by even the hardest of hearts.

It is troubling but not new that the only difference between the Supreme Court ruling of 2000 and that of 2007 was ideology represented by the presence of Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor in 2000 replaced by Justice Samuel Alito in 2007. For many decades, weighty decisions of the 5-4 type have been determined by the liberal or conservative bias of the Justices stemming from their dogged ideological convictions. If you think that this procedure does not follow true logic or justice, you are not alone.

In a practice so grisly, so mournful and depressing that the very thought of using Sundays as the backdrop for the slaughter oppresses one even more typical apr for personal loan than a usual weekday. While other folks were busy worshiping the Lord, gathering for a Sunday meal, watching a professional or other game together, or just relaxing, Dr. Kermit Gosnell and his wife were wielding scissors to snip the spinal cords of partially-born babies. In some isolated cases, the babies were completely born before the scissors reached them and terminated them.

It was the latter category of babies that got Dr. Gosnell into legal trouble. Not even cutthroat abortion law tolerates killing a baby completely outside the womb. In fact, the Gosnells made ISIS blush in their macabre snipping of the spinal cords of newly-emerging babies. Even ISIS itself does not commit infanticide on its own babies, while abortionists do kill their own. Convicted of murdering three infants born alive during an abortion procedure, Dr. Gosnell was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Most people are dead set against cruelty to animals. Yet, abortionists do not speak about cruelty to fetuses or even emerging babies. How deep and devious is small personal loans with low interest rates this hypocrisy?

Beware of decrying the atrocities of ISIS with great ferocity, lest you speak with a forked tongue in your failure to address the atrocities of your own infanticidal abortion beliefs. It may be that you are just a sanitized morphing of ISIS, following morality a-la-carte, cherry picking from the modern smorgasbord of cafeteria theology, faith and morals.

On January 22, 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 7-2 that a right to privacy under the due process clause of the 14th Amendment extended to a woman’s decision to have an abortion, but that this right must be balanced against the state’s two legitimate interests in regulating abortions: protecting prenatal life – a joke – and protecting women’s health.

Not wanting to grab a tiger by the tail, the U.S. Supreme Court shied away from defining or describing the time and circumstances when human life begins in the womb. But they are still hoisted with their own petard in declaring a fetus without legal rights until lucky payday advance it is outside the womb. That is the height of absurdity. How can the thin walls of a womb establish the difference between the legal rights and no rights of a fetus? There must be some sheer magic in traveling the skin-deep distance from within to without a womb!

This triggered the bloodletting of 55,772,015 abortions in the United States. If ISIS were pursuing internal methods of the mass murder of Americans, this would be their first strategy because it requires virtually no effort and 47 percent of Americans already believe in it.

Besides, the inhumanity of it reeks of the stench of Sharia law and, worse, the fetid in­sanity of ISIS. It is unconscionable that U.S. figures are worse than those of ISIS. Worse! Taking 2,717,991, the total of all our U.S. dead in all our wars, we must multiply by 20 to approximate the 55,772,015 U.S. abortions since the fateful day of January 22, 1973.

This article originally published in the September 29, 2014 print edition of The Louisiana Weekly newspaper.